DDR2 Roundup: Reaching for 667 and Beyond
by Wesley Fink on July 8, 2004 12:09 AM EST- Posted in
- Memory
Specifications: DDR2 Memory
Considering the delays and false starts with DDR2, we were surprised to receive DDR2 modules from 8 different manufacturers for our first DDR2 roundup. The DDR2 from Corsair was even rated at DDR2 667, which caused us to believe that the Corsair would stand head and shoulders above the crowd. We also know of other DDR2 667 samples that are on the way from OCZ and others that will soon be announced. For memory that was barely working a couple of months ago, it certainly appears that DDR2 is maturing much faster than anyone expected.The 8 DDR2 memories that we received were all rated at or near the Jedec standard for PC2-4300 of 4-4-4-12 timings. Jedec standards for PC2-5300 (DDR2 667) call for 5-5-5 timings, but our Corsair DDR2 667 was rated at the faster 4-4-4, at 667, which already shows improving timings for DDR2.
Memory | Number of DIMMs & Banks | DIMM Size Total Memory |
Rated Speed SPD Timings |
Rated Voltage |
Corsair XMS2 5300 PRO |
2 DS | 512MB 1GB |
DDR2-667 4-4-4-12 |
1.8V |
Crucial PC2-4300U |
2 DS | 512MB 1GB |
DDR2-533 4-4-4-12 |
1.8V |
Geil PC2-4300 |
2 SS | 512MB 1GB |
DDR2-533 4-4-4-11 |
1.8V |
Kingmax DDR2-533 |
2 SS | 256MB 512MB |
DDR2-533 4-4-4-12 |
1.8V |
Kingston PC2-4300 Value RAM |
2 SS | 512MB 1GB |
DDR2-533 4-4-4-12 |
1.8V |
Micron PC2-4300U |
2 DS | 512MB 1GB |
DDR2-533 4-4-4-12 |
1.8V |
Mushkin DDR2 533 |
2 SS | 512MB 1GB |
DDR2-533 4-4-4-12 |
1.8V |
OCZ Premier PC2 4300 |
2 SS | 512MB 1GB |
DDR2-533 4-4-4-11 |
1.8V |
The SPD timings were closely bunched around the 4-4-4 Jedec standard, and all the tested memory was rated at the standard DDR2 voltage of 1.8V. Unlike the standardized DDR memory, we received a mixed bag of single- and double-sided memory, even in the same memory capacity. Memory based on Micron chips, like the Micron, Crucial, and Kingmax, were rated 256MB single-sided and 512MB double-sided. Those based on Samsung, like the OCZ Premier, or Elpida, like the Kingston Value RAM, were 512MB single-sided. Double-sided 1GB modules based on these memory chips are therefore likely to appear in the very near future.
We also received 1GB DDR2 memory modules from OCZ, but these early samples were based on Samsung chips. OCZ has decided recently that Elpida chips will be used for their 1GB DDR2 modules, so we eliminated the 1GB DIMMs from our roundup, since they are not representative of production DDR2. While 1GB modules have remained rare and expensive in DDR memory, you will likely find 1GB memory widely available from many DDR2 manufacturers in the very near future. Several manufacturers also plan to introduce 2GB DIMMs in DDR2.
Another difference in DDR2 compared to DDR is the last memory timing number, or tRAS. As we have demonstrated in our DDR reviews, Intel 875/865 chipsets have performed best at the fastest tRAS settings that could be used on the motherboards. This was normally a tRAS value of 5 or 6. DDR2, on the other hand, has a specified tRAS of 11 or 12 in most cases. Does tRAS matter on DDR2 or have the performance rules changed with DDR2 memory timings?
20 Comments
View All Comments
Wesley Fink - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
#9 - Actually the first number was copied incorrectly and has now been fixed. The tRas 11 line on p.3 now reads 5303-2344-7647.FlameDeer - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Hi Wesley, nice article. :)Something to change:
At page 3, Micron PC2-4300U Table, Row tRAS 11,
Aida 32 Total should be "7697".
MIDIman - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
> When can we expect DDR2 for A64?http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
mczak - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Nice article, a real pity though there are no performance numbers for overclocked FSB only (i.e. FSB 258 / DDR2-"516"). There are some reasons to believe memory performance would also be quite a bit higher than with FSB200/DDR2-533...Bozo Galora - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Another clear concise mem article by Prometheus.KillaKilla - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
When can we expect DDR2 for A64? Even thouthe they aren't so affected by lack of memory bandwidth...rjm55 - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
I am not usually that much into memory articles, but this is one of the best reviews I have seen on the new Intel architecture. It was surprising that even the budget DDR2 did 667. When will Intel be launching 667 as an "official" DDR2 speed?Anemone - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
VERY nice article - and informative on the limits that no one else is authoritatively reviewing. Thankyou and keep them coming!:)
skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
or... im blind..skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
you should mention in the benchmarks which modules are DS and SS, so people dont go ape shit over poor performance of say... GEIL..