Today through the company’s rather short virtual launch event, among other novelties, Google has officially announced the new Pixel 4a (5G) and the new Pixel 5. Both phones had been teased for some time now as Google had pre-announced them back in in early August with the announcement of the Pixel 4a.

The new Pixel 4a (5G) is very much what its name implies, a variant of the Pixel 4a with added 5G connectivity through the addition of a Snapdragon 765 SoC. The phone here is very similar to its 4G variant, although Google had to grow the device’s dimensions a bit, and a more apt name for it would have been the 4a XL (5G) but that’s quite a mouthful.

The new Pixel 5 is a quite different phone for Google’s mainstream line-up as here the company has abandoned any attempts at making a flagship device, relegating itself into the mid-range to premium price segment. Also featuring a Snapdragon 765, the phone’s other specs are quite more conservative compared to other devices in 2020 – it’s somewhat of a risky move at a still rather high $699 price point.

2020 Google Pixels
  Pixel 4a
Pixel 4a (5G)
Pixel 5
SoC Snapdragon 730G

2x CA76 @ 2.2GHz
6x CA55 @ 1.8GHz

Adreno 618
Snapdragon 765G

1x CA76 @ 2.4GHz
1x CA76 @ 2.2GHz
6x CA55 @ 1.8GHz

Adreno 620
Storage 128GB UFS 2.1 128GB 128GB
Display 5.81" OLED
2340 x 1080 (19.5:9)

6.2" OLED
2340 x 1080 (19.5:9)

6.0" OLED
2340 x 1080 (19.5:9)

Size Height 144.0 mm 153.9 mm 144.7 mm
Width 69.4 mm 74.0 mm 70.4 mm
Depth 8.2 mm 8.2 mm 8.0 mm
Weight 143 grams 168g (sub-6)
171g (mmWave)
Battery Capacity 3140mAh (typical)

18W Fast Charging
3885mAh (typical)

18W Fast Charging
4080mAh (typical)

18W Fast Charging
Wireless Charging - - Yes
Rear Cameras
Main 12.2MP 1.4µm Dual Pixel PDAF
f/1.7 77° lens with OIS
Telephoto - - -
Wide - 16MP 1.0µm

f/2.2 107°
Ultra-Wide Angle
Extra - - -
Front Camera 8MP 1.12µm
f/2.0 84° lens; fixed focus
3.5mm headphone jack
Wireless (local) 802.11ac Wave 2 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth 5.0 LE + NFC
Cellular Snapdragon LTE
Integrated X15

(LTE Category 12/5)
DL = 600Mbps
UL = 150Mbps
Snapdragon 5G
Integrated X52

(LTE Category 18/13)
DL = 1200 Mbps
UL = 150 Mbps

(5G NR Sub-6 + mmWave*)
DL = 3700 Mbps
UL = 1600 Mbps

*excludes non-mmWave model of 4a(5G)
*excludes mmWave in non-US markets
Other Features Dual Speakers Dual Speakers Dual Speakers
IP68 Rating 
Dual-SIM 1x nanoSIM + eSIM
Launch Price $349 / 349£ / 349€
$499 / £499 / €499
$599* (mmWave)
$699* / £599 / €629

Starting off with the heart of the phones, both the new 4a (5G) and the Pixel 5 are powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 765G SoC. For the Pixel 5 this is a rather obvious choice given Google’s new targeted price range for the phone, although more on that later.

For the Pixel 4a (5G) this actually represents a rather larger bump in specifications compared to the Snapdragon 730G of the Pixel 4a, and the reasoning for the whole upgrade seems to have been 5G, and more specifically, the Snapdragon 765G’s ability to support mmWave connectivity.

Looking at Google’s pricing and different models that they’re releasing in different markets, it’s easily to see that mmWave connectivity has been a rather integral part of why Google made some of their component choices in the new Pixel devices. In the US, both the 4a (5G) and 5 support 5G connectivity with mmWave, however the 4a (5G) also comes with a 5G sub-6-only variant that’s actually $100 cheaper – this one is the publicly marketed $499 unit Google was showcasing during the launch. The Verizon Pixel 4a (5G) on the other hand costs $599. The Pixel 5 in the US costs $699 and only has a mmWave model. More on the international pricing later in the article.

RAM and storage wise, the Pixel 4a (5G) continues the 6GB configuration we’ve seen on the Pixel 4a, whilst the Pixel 5 upgrades that to 8GB. Both new phones feature 128GB of storage, however Google didn’t exactly specify the storage grade – it’s likely the 4a (5G) uses the same UFS 2.1 as on the 4a, whilst we don’t yet have confirmation on what the Pixel 5 is deploying.

On the matter of connectivity, it’s disappointing to see that Google is avoiding Wi-Fi 6 / 802.11ax in even the Pixel 5, meaning it won’t be as future proof – however given the lower price compared to a conventional flagship that’s somewhat of an acceptable compromise.

The Pixel 4a (5G) is of a similar build and design to the Pixel 4a, essentially representing a larger device that frankly could have been called the Pixel 4a XL (5G) if one would have to give it a more apt description.

The phone is still made of a polycarbonate plastic and it features a now larger 6.2” OLED screen coming in at 2340 x 1080 resolution. There’s no high refresh rate to be found here as Google is sticking to 60Hz.

As noted, it’s a larger phone and the critical dimension for ergonomics is the width, which has grown from 69.4mm to 74.0mm. The weight of the phone has also gone up from 143g to 168g for the sub-6 model and 171g for the mmWave model of the device.

The Pixel 5 employs a very similar design to both the 4a and the 5a (5G) – to the point that you actually wonder wouldn’t know that these devices are named after different generations – if that even has any kind of meaning anymore given the 4a (5G) and the 5 are almost identical in specifications.

What’s different about the Pixel 5 that you wouldn’t recognize in the pictures is that it’s made out of aluminium, which is quite interesting as we haven’t had a unibody aluminium device by a manufacturer in quite some years. One odd thing about this aspect of the phone is that Google is still employing wireless charging – so what must be happening is that there has to be some sort of cut-out in the back that’s covered in paint or some sort of layer that is hiding a non-electrically-conductive part of the back cover.

The front of the Pixel 5 looks almost identical to the 4a (5G), defined by a uniform bezel and a camera hole cut-out in the top left corner of the screen which houses the same 8MP 1.12µm f/2.0 camera that’s sported on the 4a, 4a (5G) and the 5 units.

The display is still a 2340 x 1080 resolution OLED unit, but is slightly smaller at 6.0” diagonal. The good news here is that Google at least is employing a 90Hz refresh rate on this model.

The Pixel 5 actually being of a similar form-factor to the 4a, actually is able to house a significantly larger battery at 4000mAh typical capacity – quite a large jump over the 3140mAh unit of its budget sibling. That’s actually even larger than the 3885mAh typical capacity of the new 4a (5G), even with the Pixel 5 weighing less at only 151g.

On the camera side of things, there’s good news and bad news. The good news for the Pixel 4a (5G) is that it’s using the same main camera module as on the 4a and previous generation flagship Pixels. The 12.2MP unit with 1.4µm pixels and an f/1.7 aperture optics module is still quite good in this range.

Google has evolved its HDR+ algorithm and notes that with this generation it has introduced exposure bracketing capture ability – meaning instead of stacking several captures of low exposures, it’ll now do stacking of several different exposure lengths. Hopefully this will help the phone increase its dynamic range capture abilities.

The bad news is that the Pixel 5 still continues to feature this main camera sensor.

The unit had been used since the Pixel 3 with only minor upgrades in the sensor versions. We don’t know if Google is planning to release a higher-end Pixel device above the Pixel 5 any time soon, so what this means is that Google needs to counteract with software an increasingly large hardware gap that’s kept on growing compared to the competition. The Pixel 4 already lost out to last year’s iPhone 11 series in picture quality and the Pixel 5 will unlikely to change much in that regard, as even Google’s own PR image samples of the camera show pronounced noise and lacking dynamic range.

Another positive is that there’s now an ultra-wide-angle camera module alongside the main unit. It’s been widely agreed upon that Google’s telephoto unit with the Pixel 4 was a faux-pas in a year where essentially everybody else has had or had introduced UWA cameras. Seemingly this year with the Pixel 5 Google has realised that people use phones in tighter spaces more often than shooting long distances, and opted for the UWA instead. This is a 16MP 1.0µm unit with an f/2.2 aperture and a 107° field-of-view. It’s likely amongst the narrowest UWA units out there, but I still prefer this to a telephoto – although other competitors out there don’t force you to make this choice and give you a full trifecta of camera modules to choose from.

Focusing on the mid-range? Or giving up on the high-end?

The Pixel 4a (5G) and Pixel 5 are devices that I’m having a hard time rationalising. Last year, I noted that Google had failed with the Pixel 4 – not that it was a bad device, it was just overpriced for what it delivered.

This year, Google at least made the change to their pricing structure to allow for more affordable devices, with the Pixel 5 coming in at $699, and the 4a (5G) coming in at $499 ($599 with mmWave). The problem I have is not with the prices, it’s with what Google actually delivers at those prices.

Right now, if you’re in the US you’d have to be utterly insane in considering the Pixel 5 at $699 given you have the option of a Galaxy S20 FE 5G for $599, with an SoC that obliterates the Pixel 5’s, a better higher-refresh rate screen, bigger batteries, Wi-Fi 6, and a more complete camera module setup – although I’m sure there’s arguments to be had in regards to the software processing front of things. Software support is also no longer a valid argument given that Samsung has started 3 year OS upgrade commitments going forward.

Google’s UK pricing is also frankly a bit absurd, especially on the Pixel 4a (5G) which costs $499/£499/€499 – yes there’s taxes included in the European prices, but the pound sterling hasn’t yet fallen in value like that. In these markets where we have fiercer competition available from the Asian vendors it also begs the question whether you buy a single Pixel 4a (5G) or you get two Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite’s for almost the same price – both Snapdragon 765G phones by the way. OnePlus here also undercuts both the 4a (5G) by 100€/£121 with the Nord, whilst the Pixel 5 is attacked by a slew of other flagship devices that have since fallen in price.

When I had reached out to Google asking for Pixel 5 samples, my local PR contact I’ve been relegated to replied that Google has no plans to release the device in Belgium & Luxembourg, and as such “he can’t help me further”. At this point I’m not sure what Google’s Pixel division is even trying to achieve – if you don’t even make an effort to even release the phones in most markets, and barely make the minimum effort of covering your devices during your launch event (A literal 7 minutes out of a 30 minute show) – then you’re just doomed to fail. The Pixel 4a (5G) and the Pixel 5 just feel dead on arrival for me.

Related Reading:

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • patel21 - Wednesday, September 30, 2020 - link

    I understand them adding UWA as its being used more. But why remove Telephoto lens ?
    When they already have the support for it baked into the camera software.
    Especially for the Pixel 5, which could have made the price jump from 4A 5G more bearable and understandable
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Wednesday, September 30, 2020 - link

  • Kangal - Wednesday, September 30, 2020 - link

    What do you think is the best overall Android phone of 2020 ?

    I think the best Android phone of 2020 is the Sony 5.2 (Xperia 5 II). Although it has a "quiet" loudspeaker, lacks Wireless Charging, and is priced high. Besides that, it's got everything and a polished experience. An endangered species!

    A close second, is the Sony 1.2. This loses 120Hz, gets a useless resolution bump, and suffers battery life. Also has a "quite" loudspeaker, and ridiculously over-priced. However, it has a slightly better ergonomics, and gains Wireless Charging. Pretty No Nonsense device, and one of the best overall.

    A distant third is the OnePlus 8 Pro. Has the trifecta of best hardware, software, and support. But is also high priced, very unergonomic, very fragile, annoying curved display, no microSD slot, no headphone jack. So it's a very compromised device, but a fine choice for those that "Just Settle".
  • asfletch - Thursday, October 1, 2020 - link

    I'm with you. There was a guide on here recently which IIRC didn't mention Sony but the 5 ii looks like the only strong contender for me to replace XZ1C. It's too tall, but everything else looks mint. Battery life even seems close to XZ1C, which is the icing on the cake. Now just need to wait for silly price to come down....
  • Kangal - Thursday, October 1, 2020 - link

    I don't think there will be a price drop.
    Sony makes very few amounts of these phones, ever since 2013 and the Z3, that it's hard to get one. If anything, I've seen the prices hold firm or even increase in some cases, due to shortages.

    This year's devices have been quite disappointing, in terms of price, and feature removals. At least with the two Sony handsets you only get disappointed in one aspect (price).

    Also, this year's software isn't much different/improved compared to last year's. Neither is the processor (QSD 855 vs QSD 865+5G). Nor the flagship cameras. And even the display quality is roughly equal (excluding 60Hz vs 120Hz).

    I bring this up, because if you aren't able to find in-stock, or be able to afford the Sony Mk.II (1 or 5), you could consider a flagship from 2019. The ASUS RoG Phone 2 is still a beast. The even cheaper OnePlus 7t is great value. And Samsung's S10e/S10/S10+ are solid devices no matter which size.

    That is of course, if you even are in need of an upgrade. Whichever you pick, these will all be CHEAPER AND BETTER than the Google Pixel 5 discussed in this article. What a joke.
  • sharath.naik - Saturday, October 3, 2020 - link

    Does not mater which is the best. Looks like Google is being sabotaged to not be the best. They need to fire the person/Group responsible for decisions like removing the telephoto camera.
  • sonny73n - Thursday, October 1, 2020 - link

    You sound like a god dammed Sony shill - asking a question and answering it yourself. One thing I know for sure is Sony phones are way overpriced and come with crappy cameras.
    "An endangered species". You're right - With their stupid designs one after another, Sony phones should've had disappeared.
  • Tams80 - Thursday, October 1, 2020 - link

    Sony phone cameras have always been decent, they just got overtaken. And the camera team have taken over the camera software now, so you can cut that crap out.

    That you want a company that offers one of the few complete smartphones with fantastic quality just shows how clueless and selfish you are. If anyone is a shill here, it's you.
  • goanandduck - Thursday, October 1, 2020 - link

    Just registered to say: No they haven't been decent. I can't recall any moment in let's say the past 5 years when they were even equal to their competitors. Awful processing and awful DR. And that's coming from someone who kept buying their phones because they had the only serious compact option, which sadly is also no longer true.
  • Kangal - Friday, October 2, 2020 - link

    Firstly, I want to make clear to everyone that I'm not a shill.
    If I was, then I wouldn't bring up the negative aspects/shortfalls of the device (ahem "quiet loudspeaker"). Besides, I don't even own it, nor am I loyal or fanboy of any logo. I asked a question directly to Andrei to get his opinion, knowing he probably would read it, but wouldn't respond. So I followed with my (objective?) opinions, so that people knew where I stood.

    Moving on; with Sony phone's camera performance, I have to agree with most readers here. They were "decent" from 2010 until 2014. Quiet a disappointment from 2015 to 2019, if you were buying Brand New and paying RRP, when the competitors were stronger.

    From 2014, we had Apple enter the Medium/Large phone market, and the other competitors step up photography wise. After that Sony were continually playing catch-up... they used some of the best Camera Hardware, but it was wasted with their immature Camera Software. Especially in early-2016 when the Samsung S7+ blew away the competition, followed soon by iPhone 7+, and then the Google Pixel XL. It's been tough for Sony.

    Now, things are so good, it's harder to tell the flagship cameras apart. Even OnePlus, which is traditionally known for having poor cameras is offering some of the best shots on the 8 Pro. I think Huawei still (barely) holds the crown with the P40 Pro overall, with the iPhone 11 Max probably having the best point'n'shoot performance. And Sony? In 2020 they've finally caught up to the competition, that it trades blows evenly with other flagships like Apple, Google, Samsung, OnePlus, and Huawei.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now